![]() ![]() On a related note, Catholicism in those days wasn’t nearly as focused on religious uniformity as people think. This made for endless political interactions and changes throughout the history of the crusades. Just like Islam was already divided into Sunni and Shiite, Christians were already divided into Catholic and Orthodox churches. That Christianity was all one thing at the time. Medieval europe knights housing full#Roughly the same amount of time as separates flintlock muskets from automatic rifles, also separates full mail and full plate armor. Plate harness wouldn’t be invented until hundreds of years after the end of the crusades. The kn ights wore suits of s olid plate a rmo r Those kinds of alliances could not have happened if the whole thing was about religious hatred. Christians and Muslims also made treaties with, and against, their common alien culture, the Mongols. ![]() If and when the Christian crusader states got too big and powerful, the Shia and Sunni would set aside their differences to keep the Christians in check. If a Shia faction got too powerful, the reverse would occur. So if a Sunni warlord got too big and dangerous, his Shiite and Christian neighbors would team up against him. The middle east was basically city-states at the time due to the nature of the climate and ecology. If it suited their purpose, European crusaders would ally with Muslims. Instead, here is a little known fact that usually blows the minds of people who think the crusades were purely motivated by past people’s irritation at the existence of other religions. The geopolitics were much more complicated than that. Were the crusades were caused by religious intolerance But, they wouldn’t appear barbaric in comparison to each other, either. The reality is if you got a totally dispassionate third party to get in a time machine and go observe the middle east or Europe in the 11th or 12th century, nobody, on either side, would appear very civilized by today’s standard. There’s a prevalent idea that crusaders were crazy barbarians who couldn’t even count, and the Muslim were like desert themed neo-classical humanists. The crusades expanded trade and expanded the flow of ideas, but they did not invent them overnight the way simple books will present it. ![]() The crusades opened up trade and learning to Europe, which was a cesspool of ignorance and economic stagnation prior to the crusades But that’s how it worked out due to shifts in politics that played out in realtime. No one actually intended to go found the crusader states. They kept running into unexpected situations and had to improvise solutions on the spot. To fully understand this, you have to get a sense of how truly ad hoc the First Crusade was. In truth, most crusaders lost money, and fully expected to lose money, on their campaigns. The crusaders were fighting to steal wealth or land The reality is., that a knights armor was great and when Muslim forces captured large amounts of European armor, they used it. Here we list some of the biggest misconceptions that people had about European knights and crusdaers during the medieval period. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |